SC Judge Questions ‘Untouchability’ of Women During Sabarimala Hearing
During a pivotal hearing concerning the Sabarimala temple entry issue, a Supreme Court judge made a significant observation, asserting that women cannot be subjected to treatment akin to ‘untouchability’ for a period of three days.
Justice Nagarathna’s Direct Remark
The pointed comment came from Justice B.V. Nagarathna, who highlighted concerns over the practice of isolating or treating women as ritually impure, specifically mentioning a three-day duration, within the broader context of the Sabarimala proceedings.
Context of the Sabarimala Debate
The Sabarimala case continues to be a subject of intense legal and social discourse, revolving around the traditional restrictions on women of menstruating age entering the temple. Justice Nagarathna’s recent remark underscores the ongoing judicial scrutiny into the customs and their implications for gender equality and dignity.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Q: Who made the comment about women being treated as ‘untouchable’?
A: Supreme Court Justice B.V. Nagarathna made this observation during the Sabarimala hearing. - Q: What was the specific duration mentioned regarding the treatment of women?
A: Justice Nagarathna specifically mentioned that women cannot be treated as ‘untouchable’ for three days. - Q: In what context was this remark made?
A: The remark was made during the ongoing hearings related to the Sabarimala temple entry case in the Supreme Court.
Justice Nagarathna’s observation during the Sabarimala hearing brings a sharp focus to the debate surrounding the treatment of women, emphasizing that traditional practices should not lead to their isolation or perceived untouchability, particularly concerning a three-day period.
